1. Suborbital angle
obsolete (Fig. 94a); areola constituting more than 40 percent of
entire length of
carapace (Fig.
95a):.........................................................................
Cambarus (C.) ortmanni Williamson, 1907.
(Lotic and
lentic habitats and burrows in eastern Indiana, western Ohio, and adjacent
northern
Kentucky. Literature: Williamson, 1907;
Rhoades, 1944a).
Suborbital angle present (Fig.
94b); areola
constituting less than 40 per cent of entire length of
carapace (Fig.
95b, c):........................................................................................................................................
2
Fig. 94.
Lateral view of cephalic region. a, Cambarus
ortmanni; b, C. b. bartonii.
(Lotic habitats
in the Chattahoochee River system from Hall to Douglas County,
Georgia.
Literature: Hobbs and Hall, 1969).
Rostrum with margins somewhat abruptly contracted
at base of acumen (Figs. 95c, 96):........................
3
Fig. 95.
Dorsal view of carapaces. a, Cambarus ortmanni;
b, C. howardi; c, C. bartonii
carinirostris.
3(2). Rostrum with broad, short
median elevation (carina) on dorsal surface near apex (Fig.
95c):..
...................................................................................................
Cambarus (C.) bartonii carinirostris
Hay, 1914.
(Lotic habitats
in the Cheat, Greenbrier (?), and Tygart rivers, West Virginia. This
is a local variant of C. bartonii and probably should not be
recognized. Literature: Ortmann, 1931).
Rostrum without median elevation on dorsal
surface near apex (Fig. 96):.....................................................
4
4(3). Rostrum with conspicuously
thickened margins forming angular bend (occasionally with slightly
projecting knobs) at base of acumen
(Fig. 96a):.................... Cambarus
(C.) sciotensis Rhoades, 1944.
(Lotic habitats
in the Scioto River drainage, Ohio and Kanawha drainage in West Virginia
and
southwestern Virginia. Literature: Rhoades, 1944b).
Rostrum without conspicuously thickened margins,
latter never forming angular bend or knobs
at base of acumen (Fig.
96b, c):..........................................................................................................................
5
Fig. 96.
Dorsal view of carapaces. a, Cambarus
sciotensis; b, C. bartonii cavatus;
c, C. b. bartonii.
5(4). Rostrum deeply excavate
dorsally, often almost bladlelike (Fig. 96b):.........................................................
.......................................................................................................
Cambarus (C.)
bartonii cavatus Hay, 1902.
(Lotic habitats
in the Tennessee River drainage system from southwestern Virginia to
Walden
Gorge, Tennessee. It is questionalbe that this subspecies
should be recognized.
Literature: Ortmann, 1931).
Rostrum only shallowly excavate dorsally, never
ladlelike (Fig. 96c; see also Figs.
86b, 88d, 89l,
90a, 94b):.
..................................................................................................
Cambarus (C.) bartonii
bartonii (Fabricius, 1789).
(Lotic and
lentic habitats from New Brunswick, Canada, to northern Georgia, Ohio, and
Tennessee;
restricted to the mountains and foothills from North
Carolina southward. Literature: Crocker and
Barr, 1968;
Ortmann, 1931).